« Proof the Semantic Web is Doomed | Main | My draft paper on spectrum policy »
September 16, 2003
IP ping pong
Law professors Eugene Volokh and Lawence Solum argue back and forth (and back and forth)
over whether intellectual property is conceptually justified.
Volokh says it is, because analogies to tangible property hold
up. Solum questions his analysis (though he ultimately says they agree on a key point). Worth reading as background for
thinking about the digital music wars.
--------
Posted by Kevin Werbach at September 16, 2003 9:44 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Comments
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)